X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:16:26 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Bug? LLVM builds fail on 1.7.8 (fenv.h)
Message-ID: <20110310101626.GY12899@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <AANLkTi=WbQujm3y7eVKnqR8y+_cuDwaCE3q+aAjMT7am AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20110310092613 DOT GW12899 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20110310093147 DOT GX12899 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <1299751169 DOT 5844 DOT 10 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1299751169.5844.10.camel@YAAKOV04>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mar 10 03:59, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 10:31 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > \Hang on, I take that back.  I just realized that this is actually all
> > in the GCC header files and that GCC actually uses _GLIBC prefixed
> > macros, even on systems not using glibc.  Oh well.
> > 
> > Dave?  Any chance we can get a new gcc 4.3.4 package with this change
> > ASAP?
> 
> >From a previous discussion with Dave, that should be a 4.5.2 built
> against 1.7.8.  If that's not happening really soon, though, I'll
> probably spin a release for Ports instead.

IIUC fenv does not rely on 4.5.x, it's just that 4.5.x needs fenv,
isn't it?

So, for the time being it should be sufficient to get a gcc4-g++-4.3.3-4
package with just a tweaked c++config.h.  I have often replaced a file
in a package by just unpacking and repacking the source and binary
packages without rebuilding, but I don't know if this c++config.h change
would require a rebuild...


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple