X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Subject: Re: Bug? LLVM builds fail on 1.7.8 (fenv.h) From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" To: cygwin In-Reply-To: <20110310093147.GX12899@calimero.vinschen.de> References: <20110310092613 DOT GW12899 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20110310093147 DOT GX12899 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 03:59:29 -0600 Message-ID: <1299751169.5844.10.camel@YAAKOV04> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 10:31 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > \Hang on, I take that back. I just realized that this is actually all > in the GCC header files and that GCC actually uses _GLIBC prefixed > macros, even on systems not using glibc. Oh well. > > Dave? Any chance we can get a new gcc 4.3.4 package with this change > ASAP? From a previous discussion with Dave, that should be a 4.5.2 built against 1.7.8. If that's not happening really soon, though, I'll probably spin a release for Ports instead. Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple