X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A209DAA10048 AT NIHMLBX02 DOT nih DOT gov> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 08:51:03 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: New Cygwin release From: Andy Koppe To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 9 March 2011 02:54, Karl M wrote: > >> From: BBuchbinder >> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 18:49:29 -0500 >> Subject: RE: New Cygwin release >> >> Karl M sent the following at Tuesday, March 08, 2011 4:57 PM >> >Is another Cygwin release planned for after the current round of bug >> >fixes settles down and before significant new development starts again? >> >> As of last Monday: >> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-02/msg00583.html >> > Hi... > > I was referring to a post 1.7.8-1 release, I am running 1.7.8-1. > The bug fixes to which I refer are the ones going on now in response > to 1.7.8-1 getting wider usage. So I was looking at getting most of > these bug fixes released before development resumes. That's certainly been the pattern in previous rounds: 1.7.2 to 1.7.5 were released in quick succession, as were 1.7.6 and 1.7.7. Andy -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple