X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-Id: From: Denis Excoffier To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: cygwin AT Denis-Excoffier DOT org Subject: Re: New Cygwin release Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 04:52:44 +0100 References: ,<0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A209DAA10048 AT NIHMLBX02 DOT nih DOT gov> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 2011-03-09 03:54, Karl M wrote: > >> From: BBuchbinder >> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 18:49:29 -0500 >> Subject: RE: New Cygwin release >> >> Karl M sent the following at Tuesday, March 08, 2011 4:57 PM >>> Is another Cygwin release planned for after the current round of bug >>> fixes settles down and before significant new development starts >>> again? >> >> As of last Monday: >> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-02/msg00583.html >> > Hi... > > I was referring to a post 1.7.8-1 release, I am running 1.7.8-1. > The bug fixes to which I refer are the ones going on now in response > to 1.7.8-1 getting wider usage. So I was looking at getting most of > these bug fixes released before development resumes. Indeed! For example a 1.7.8-2, with - pb winmm.dll error 487 corrected - pb ____xpg_strerror corrected would be fine for me. Thanks in advance. Denis Excoffier. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple