X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Andrew Schulman <schulman DOT andrew AT epamail DOT epa DOT gov>
Subject: Re: setup.exe considerations (was: Doubtful about unison)
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 08:45:35 -0500
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <rq6vm6933gqhkcdj497v6ct2otp0k91que@4ax.com>
References: <ikf9e3$ub2$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org>	<ikfe1p$f00$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org>	<ikgf2f$vtm$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org>	<fggnm61cfbkp0fm6jm0lvrns74bk56bls4 AT 4ax DOT com>	<ikgjlh$tk7$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org>	<aamnm61uhbmgbrq007c6oag7cd7n9hpdt2 AT 4ax DOT com>	<ikgt6p$ubn$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org>	<4D6BFD09 DOT 8020600 AT gmx DOT de>	<AANLkTimi6R8MFSH63quHW3EqV4z5ucwtgNEPmCWWfjjc AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>	<4D6CD103 DOT 7000303 AT gmx DOT de>	<i0vpm6pur5ipemqekfb9m1467ggnbkr70v AT 4ax DOT com> <AANLkTi=XSNxNp1M5RBGdXqdVSFuE-3KvFnXN2Y1q1E2F AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archive: encrypt
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

> I think it would be entirely reasonable to record the version you
> built against as the minimum requirement, as you couldn't be expected
> to test against older libraries as well. Wanting to use latest Unison
> with an old Cygwin DLL is a case of having your cake and eating it,
> it's just that it would be good if setup.exe was able to point that
> out. But, in another bakery-related metaphor, this is pie-in-the-sky.

I don't know, it seems half-baked to me :)


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple