X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Olivier Lefevre <lefevrol AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject: Re: setup.exe considerations
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 15:28:34 +0100
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <ikivqn$got$2@dough.gmane.org>
References: <ikf9e3$ub2$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org>	<ikfe1p$f00$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org>	<ikgf2f$vtm$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org>	<fggnm61cfbkp0fm6jm0lvrns74bk56bls4 AT 4ax DOT com>	<ikgjlh$tk7$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org>	<aamnm61uhbmgbrq007c6oag7cd7n9hpdt2 AT 4ax DOT com>	<ikgt6p$ubn$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org>	<4D6BFD09 DOT 8020600 AT gmx DOT de>	<AANLkTimi6R8MFSH63quHW3EqV4z5ucwtgNEPmCWWfjjc AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>	<4D6CD103 DOT 7000303 AT gmx DOT de> <AANLkTinM+oB9m1K5vFz3rVR-sr1sYPdhJ0Wg33czP1oZ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinM+oB9m1K5vFz3rVR-sr1sYPdhJ0Wg33czP1oZ@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 3/1/2011 1:46 PM, Andy Koppe wrote:
> Good idea, although that would entail unnecessary (and unwanted)
> updates, for example, the Cygwin DLL would get updated whatever
> package you installed, even if the package was built years ago.

Indeed and upgrading Cygwin itself is the very thing I was trying
to avoid.

>> On the other hand, Cygwin package maintainers do a pretty good job of
>> not breaking existing setups, so "update everything" (to the "curr"
>> version) is usually a safe bet.
>
> True, and anything else is unsupported.

Fair enough.

-- O.L.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple