X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4D602970.8070100@etr-usa.com> Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 13:34:56 -0700 From: Warren Young User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Please test latest developer snapshot References: <20110217120400 DOT GB29762 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4D600C0A DOT 9080305 AT etr-usa DOT com> <4D600D62 DOT 4090008 AT etr-usa DOT com> In-Reply-To: <4D600D62.4090008@etr-usa.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 2/19/2011 11:35 AM, Warren Young wrote: > On 2/19/2011 11:29 AM, Warren Young wrote: >> $ rmdir . >> rmdir: failed to remove `.': Invalid argument > > Nevermind. It doesn't work on Linux, either. I guess /bin/rmdir has code > in it to check for that, which rmdir(2) does not. Better test, which does work with 20110215, and which proves it's rmdir(1) being too clever, but not so clever it can't be outsmarted: $ mkdir foo $ cd foo $ rmdir ../foo Eat that, rmdir(1)! -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple