X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_SV
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4D5AA6D0.20201@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:16:16 -0800
From: David Rothenberger <daveroth AT acm DOT org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: svn
References: <ij1160$346$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org> <4D540927 DOT 9030000 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>	<83vd0rmzd6 DOT fsf AT garydjones DOT name> <4D54506B DOT 7080702 AT acm DOT org>	<ij2qqj$puh$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org> <4D5563A9 DOT 60607 AT acm DOT org>	<ijao45$d1j$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org> <4D596749 DOT 7000708 AT acm DOT org> <ijdmt3$jiu$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org>
In-Reply-To: <ijdmt3$jiu$1@dough.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 2/15/2011 3:09 AM, Gary wrote:
> David Rothenberger wrote:
>> On 2/14/2011 12:11 AM, Gary wrote:
> 
>>> If I can replace svn in the sequence with something else, for example
>>> tortoise, and everything then works, then Cygwin/svn *is* the culprit.
>>
>> If the bits are identical, then what else could be breaking your build?
>> Perhaps the permissions on files, as I suggested in the same email you
>> partially quoted above?
> 
> You said:
> 
>> [if bytes identiocal] I can't see how svn could be the culprit.
>>
>> Unless perhaps the permissions on some of the DLLs are different. It
>> might be worth using cacls to inspect the ACLs on some of the DLLs.
> 
> I could't comment on that, because I hadn't had time to try it out. They
> are different - the files checked out with Tortoise correctly (I guess)
> have the various EXECUTE flags set, those with Cygwin's svn do not.

If those files have the svn:executable property set, then it's a bug in
Cygwin's svn. Otherwise, you just need to set that property on the DLLs.
Maybe TortoiseSVN does some special handling for DLLs.

-- 
David Rothenberger  ----  daveroth AT acm DOT org

The Public is merely a multiplied "me."
                -- Mark Twain

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple