X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_SV X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4D5563A9.60607@acm.org> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:28:25 -0800 From: David Rothenberger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: svn References: <4D540927 DOT 9030000 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> <83vd0rmzd6 DOT fsf AT garydjones DOT name> <4D54506B DOT 7080702 AT acm DOT org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 2/11/2011 12:08 AM, Gary wrote: > David Rothenberger wrote: > >> I would diff the TortoiseSVN checkout and the Cygwin client's >> checkout. Maybe that will show you what's different and help us >> understand why. > > Well I did, and assuming I used the correct command, the differences are > only to be found in the .svn/entries files: I would have excluded the .svn directories from the comparison myself. If the files checked out in both directories are byte-for-byte identical (including binary files), I can't see how svn could be the culprit. Unless perhaps the permissions on some of the DLLs are different. It might be worth using cacls to inspect the ACLs on some of the DLLs. -- David Rothenberger ---- daveroth AT acm DOT org Brain damage is all in your head. -- Karl Lehenbauer -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple