X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_SV X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4D54506B.7080702@acm.org> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:54:03 -0800 From: David Rothenberger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: svn References: <4D540927 DOT 9030000 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> <83vd0rmzd6 DOT fsf AT garydjones DOT name> In-Reply-To: <83vd0rmzd6.fsf@garydjones.name> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 2/10/2011 12:03 PM, Gary wrote: > Hmm. Well, I would hope that "svn co ." just gets whatever happens > to be in the repo - LF, CRLF, whatever - and doesn't feck with them just > because they are not the line endings some program someone might want to > sometime use, expects. Is that not the case? I think this depends on the svn:eol-style property for the file[1]. I would diff the TortoiseSVN checkout and the Cygwin client's checkout. Maybe that will show you what's different and help us understand why. [1] http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.advanced.props.file-portability.html -- David Rothenberger ---- daveroth AT acm DOT org Volunteer Cygwin Subversion maintainer. On a clear disk you can seek forever. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple