X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_CG,TW_EG,TW_FN,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: jojelino Subject: Re: sigsegv in compiled cygwin Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 03:12:51 +0900 Lines: 45 Message-ID: References: <20110204150118 DOT GA20523 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.2; rv:2.0b12pre) Gecko/20110204 Thunderbird/3.3a3pre In-Reply-To: <20110204150118.GA20523@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com i found small piece of code that need some comment. from trunk int (*wsastartup) (int, WSADATA *); /* Don't use autoload to load WSAStartup to eliminate recursion. */ wsastartup = (int (*)(int, WSADATA *)) GetProcAddress ((HMODULE) (dll->handle), "WSAStartup"); would have meant typedef int __stdcall (*pfnwsastartup) (int, WSADATA *); pfnwsastartup wsastartup; wsastartup = (pfnwsastartup) GetProcAddress ((HMODULE) (dll->handle), "WSAStartup"); otherwise stack frame would be damaged. On 2011-02-05 오전 12:01, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 09:40:46PM +0900, jojelino wrote: >> i'm trying to build cygwin with gcc 4.6 trunk. and compile succeed. >> but when i try to run cygwin-linked executables with new-compiled-one, >> initialization routine failed with sigsegv at win32_whatever+14 >> >> 0x61171a20<+0>: jmp 0x61171a25 >> 0x61171a25<+5>: mov 0x61171a2c,%eax >> 0x61171a2a<+10>: call *(%eax) >> 0x61171a2c<+12>: sbb %al,%al >> => 0x61171a2e<+14>: pop %ss >> >> it seems redirection statement('Kludge alert') in autoload.cc didn't >> work as expected. >> what would i do?? > > Well, since you're trying to do something cutting edge and unsupported > it seems like you will have to debug the problem using gdb and, if you > really want this to work, make a change to autoload.cc to fix the > problem. Look at a call frame for normal program and find where > the return address is stored. > > Either that or wait for us to move to a newer version of gcc. > > cgf > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple