X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4D4C81C0.4070806@etr-usa.com> Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 15:46:24 -0700 From: Warren Young User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, bug-gnulib AT gnu DOT org, bug-coreutils AT gnu DOT org Subject: Re: 16-bit wchar_t on Windows and Cygwin References: <20110202122102 DOT GD2675 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <201102021229 DOT 04623 DOT bruno AT clisp DOT org> <201102021702 DOT 57387 DOT bruno AT clisp DOT org> <20110202162801 DOT GH2675 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20110202163516 DOT GI2675 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: <20110202163516.GI2675@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 2/2/2011 9:35 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > If only the one's who decided that wchar_t in Cygwin should have the > same size as WCHAR_T in the underlying Windows would have thought twice > about the implications... Cygwin 1.9? Or maybe 2.0, if it breaks ABIs? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple