X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Thorsten Kampe <thorsten AT thorstenkampe DOT de>
Subject: Re: Where to find a reliable provider of CygwinX?
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:08:54 +0100
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <iidrb8$ovl$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <4D48169F DOT 3030607 AT steensgaard DOT org> <AANLkTi=bgxvGt3PyvxQ_0x5c3DPbogWLZ595z3o_Y5ih AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <ii9c7f$33r$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org> <4D48376C DOT 8070204 AT cygwin DOT com> <ii9ih4$9j9$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org> <20110201182757 DOT GA3139 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <ii9ssl$6bh$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org> <20110201214637 DOT GA6594 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <iic4it$f7$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

* Jørgen Steensgaard (Wed, 02 Feb 2011 18:34:15 +0100)
> I want to terminate this discussion, originating from my concern for 
> consistency among distribution providers.
> 
> Originally I reported on a successful installation of basic Cygwin, i.e. 
> without X, followed by a failing attempt to install X.  Of course I have 
> been aware all the way that X did not come with the basic installation, 
> and I have no idea of how to install X on top of it without using 
> setup.exe by Cygwin.  Still I am asked to specify how I obtained the 
> packages for X, because they are not part of the basic installation.
> 
> I see no reason to spend more time on this, the experience of which is 
> like being part of an absurd comedy, to say it mildly.  I feel confident 
> that I can overcome the technical issues if I use the time on them instead.

You were asked simple and specific questions. You didn't bother to 
answer these questions. That's not absurd but rather sad.

Thorsten


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple