X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Yahoo-SMTP: jenXL62swBAWhMTL3wnej93oaS0ClBQOAKs8jbEbx_o- Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 13:08:57 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [Bug] Named Pipes (FIFO) / Bash Message-ID: <20110130180857.GA25113@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <87ipxgirl7 DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <8762t65s8v DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8762t65s8v.fsf@Rainer.invalid> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 04:24:48PM +0100, Achim Gratz wrote: >> I'd be grateful for any insights and/or ideas for possible workarounds. > >Could anybody please comment if there are changes to the whole area of >(named) pipes in the upcoming 1.7.8 release? There are no changes to named pipes in 1.7.8. Unfortunately, they will remain broken in this release. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple