X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,TW_DF X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4D3F9AC6.3040605@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 03:53:42 +0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin Mailing List Subject: Still on target for imminent 1.7.8 release? [was Re: Enable dfp routines in compiler support lib] References: <4D3EF76F DOT 7090408 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <4D3F7C6F DOT 4060600 AT gmail DOT com> <4D3F76E2 DOT 80207 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> In-Reply-To: <4D3F76E2.80207@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com [ First attempt to post to the main list was blocked because of a bad keyword in the subject; trying again on the theory that the word "BID" might have been what tripped the spamfilter. ] [ Nope, that wasn't it. Second try. ] On 26/01/2011 01:20, JonY wrote: > On 1/26/2011 09:44, Dave Korn wrote: >> On 25/01/2011 16:16, JonY wrote: >>> I noticed cygwin has dfp enabled in dfp.m4, but no such associated >>> symbols in libgcc. t-dfprules seems to be missing in the makefile fragments. >> Yeah, I wasn't going to add that until it was clearer when the next Cygwin >> release is due out. If we check this in straight away, nobody will be able to >> build GCC without having to go to a CVS or snapshot release of cygwin, because >> they won't have fenv.h installed. >> >> Last time I checked(*), the plan was for 1.7.8 in January. Both January and >> the time available for getting this in before 4.6 branches are ticking away >> quickly. Could you perhaps ping the cygwin list for us and check that a >> release is indeed imminent? If confirmed, this is OK. >> > I didn't know fenv.h was required, as I've only noticed the BID routines > missing when actually using the dfp features. Looks like there was more > to this. > > Hey cygwin-devel, any plans for fenv.h release in 1.7.8? We already have fenv.h in CVS, so it will be in 1.7.8 automatically. That means this isn't really a -devel thing, so redirecting: Hey, main list! Are we still expecting 1.7.8 by the end of this month? cheers, DaveK -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple