X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: No manual entry for awk Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:24:22 -0800 Message-ID: <27D7F4C907BCB14FAF95CC4E25AB1FE60155AEAB@ex2.AdBriteInc.local> In-Reply-To: <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A209C0F0729F@NIHMLBX02.nih.gov> References: <4D3781E7 DOT 2010004 AT ateb DOT com> <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A209C0F0729F AT NIHMLBX02 DOT nih DOT gov> From: "Bill Ross" To: "Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]" , , , "Chris Velevitch" X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Just a heads-up: I expect that few, if any, people on this list find your > observation interesting, and fewer, if any, will think it an issue. (Or > is it the other way around?) Since you do, I'd suggest that you consider > looking over the documentation; doing so may save you a lot of=20 >"interesting" surprises. I think that, if awk is linked to gawk, 'man awk' should bring up the gawk man page. (Whether there's someone to make that happen is another issue.) Bill -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple