X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 13:22:55 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin Users Guide (cygwin-ug-net.html) not installed with doc Message-ID: <20110115182255.GC3616@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20110115064609 DOT GA19088 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <053401cbb4ca$d065d840$1d05a8c0 AT olabinc DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <053401cbb4ca$d065d840$1d05a8c0@olabinc.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 07:42:26AM -0800, Otto Hirr wrote: >> From: Christopher Faylor > Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 10:46 PM >> > Otto wrote: >> >I'm not sure which you are calling a bug: >> >1) no html docs >> >2) failing info cmd on cygwin-ug-net >> > >> >I'm thinking your are refering to (2). >> >> Yes. I am referring to 2, i.e., the actual thing I >> mentioned. It can't >> be a "bug" if it was never intended to have html docs in the package. > >So can we also add a "feature" request, to generate the html docs also? Yes. I got it. You want html documentation. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple