X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4D2DB29D.7010406@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:54:37 +0100
From: Matthias Andree <matthias DOT andree AT gmx DOT de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: suggestion (was Re: 1.7.7: Localization does not follow the language of the OS)
References: <44682 DOT 83 DOT 86 DOT 0 DOT 251 DOT 1294773608 DOT squirrel AT lavabit DOT com> <4D2CFAC9 DOT 6040706 AT laposte DOT net> <20110112095907 DOT GC6353 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4D2D7D5D DOT 7080800 AT gmx DOT de> <20110112105559 DOT GI6353 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To: <20110112105559.GI6353@calimero.vinschen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Am 12.01.2011 11:55, schrieb Corinna Vinschen:

>> export LANG="$(locale -uU)"    # (or -sU for system default locale)
> 
> It's just another way to express the same.  Backticks are not obsolete.
> The backtick style is exactly as much POSIX as the $() style.  See
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18
> 
> Other than that, this isn't a mailing list about programming style.

Try mixing backticks with quoting and blanks, or try nesting them, and then
you'll know it's not about style but pretty much about functionality, hence,
obsolete (whether it's labelled as such in the standard or not - there is a
better alternative).

If it were equivalent, I hadn't posted this.  It isn't.

-- 
Matthias Andree

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple