X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4D27AEF0.2000102@users.sourceforge.net> References: <4D27AEF0 DOT 2000102 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 18:10:19 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Bad rebaseall interaction with new mingw From: Daniel Colascione To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:25 PM, JonY wrote: > IMHO rebaseall shouldn't be interacting with mingw dlls at all. Maybe it > can check for dependencies on cygwin1.dll before rebasing? That's the point. The mingw DLLs need to be added to rebaseall's filter pattern. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple