X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-Yahoo-SMTP: Uu383n6swBCEN1G9up0WSnxbvN8fCPmk
Message-ID: <4D23AC85.1070808@cygwin.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 18:25:57 -0500
From: "Larry Hall \(Cygwin\)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
CC: leonv AT vaultnow DOT com
Subject: Re: Cygwin Support for Shadow Copies Exposed As Drives?
References: <002b01cbac64$54079040$fc16b0c0$@vaultnow.com>
In-Reply-To: <002b01cbac64$54079040$fc16b0c0$@vaultnow.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 1/4/2011 6:08 PM, Leon Vanderploeg wrote:
> I didn't see an email reply to
> <008801cbab56$59188f30$0b49ad90$@vaultnow.com>  in my email, but I did see a
> reply in the forum.  I am not sure about the right way to get back to the
> original item, but I'm hoping this will get it there.

It did.  But it wasn't smart enough to maintain the list threading.  I believe
you're missing the "References" field but don't quote me on that.

In general, if you want a reply specifically to come to you, you have to
request it.  The list directs all replies back to the list so the easiest
way to make sure you see a response is to subscribe. ;-)

<snip>

>
> Thanks for the quick reply.  I just pulled down the 2010-12-29.  It, to
> failed the rsync chdir to an exposed drive.  I scanned the change logs on
> all the snapshots listed on the page you suggested and I didn't see anything
> on shadow copies.

OK, it was a bit of a long-shot but I remembered some other discussion of
rsync recently and thought there might be a correlation.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple