Message-ID: <4D225927.7070508@cygwin.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 18:17:59 -0500
From: "Larry Hall \(Cygwin\)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Cygwin Support for Shadow Copies Exposed As Drives?
References: <008801cbab56$59188f30$0b49ad90$@vaultnow.com>
In-Reply-To: <008801cbab56$59188f30$0b49ad90$@vaultnow.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 1/3/2011 9:56 AM, Leon Vanderploeg wrote:
> I have hit a brick wall in the Cygwin 1.7 arena -- shadow copies exposed as
> drives can no longer be accessed.  See
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-07/msg00954.html for an example of previous
> documentation on this issue.
>
> Are there any plans for a patch or work-around to allow an exposed shadow
> drive to be accessed by a program such as rsync?
>
> Thanks in advance, and best regards,
> Leon

Have you tried a recent snapshot? <http://cygwin.com/snapshots/>

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple