X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:37:38 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: ioctl() on socket fd's take 3 seconds on 1.7.7 Message-ID: <20101124083738.GE18309@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20101115162242 DOT GF17405 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4CE8046F DOT 2090106 AT arcor DOT de> <20101122131729 DOT GT18309 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20101123101856 DOT GA18309 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20101123153850 DOT GC18309 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Nov 23 21:19, Jason Curl wrote: > On 23/11/2010 16:38, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > I applied a patch so that IFF_NOARP is > >only set for PPP and SLIP devices, so the call to SendARP is gone. > >Please test CVS or the next developer snapshot. > > > I tried to understand what this flag is for. As far as I can > understand, windows will always reply to ARP requests. There's a > registry entry for "gratuitous arp". So doesn't that imply IFF_NOARP > will be set for all interfaces? You mean, it should *not* be set for all interface, don't you? PPP and SLIP interfaces usually don't do ARP, so I just set the flag for them unconditionally. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple