X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:26:25 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: NetAPP / cygwin 1.7.7-1 avoid Recycle BIN dot files
Message-ID: <20101122142625.GW18309@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20101117153803 DOT GB11144 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <1PIkw2-1epSuu0 AT fwd05 DOT aul DOT t-online DOT de> <20101117174620 DOT GD11144 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20101122142055 DOT GU18309 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20101122142055.GU18309@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Nov 22 15:20, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Nov 17 18:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Nov 17 17:32, koerner.sebastian wrote:
> > > Hello Corinna,
> > >  
> > >  Oh, btw.  In your OP you claimed that you have netapps for which Cygwin
> > >  returns "cifs" and other netapps for which Cygwin returns "vfat" as
> > >  filesystem.  The above one is clearly one of the "cifs" type.
> > >  
> > >  Here's the question: Do you *really* have some for which the latest
> > >  Cygwin 1.7.7 or the latest snapshot returns "vfat" and are they *really*
> > >  netapps?  In theory I'd expect that those are just remote FAT FS on some
> > >  remote Windows machine, and they shouldn't be affected by the reported
> > >  problem.
> > >  
> > > 
> > > I just checked and think I must have something mixed up.
> > > Under 1.7.7-1 both netapps are listed in "mount" as cifs and in getVolInfo as FAT with pretty much the same attribute set.
> > 
> > Pretty much is not the same.  Can you please send the getVolInfo output
> > for the other drive, too?
> 
> And, can you please check the next developer snapshot from
> http://cygwin.com/snapshots and see if it fixes your problem?

More details:  The patch is supposed to recognize netapp drives claiming
to be FAT as well.  So mount should show "netapp" now, rather than
"cifs".  It should also result in not using the recycle bin method for
your FAT-faking netapp drives.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple