X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 09:43:57 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: openssl-0.9.8p-1, openssl-devel-0.9.8p-1, libopenssl098-0.9.8p-1 Message-ID: <20101117084357.GC3007@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4CE307CE DOT 5040903 AT alice DOT it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CE307CE.5040903@alice.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com [Redirected to cygwin-apps list, cygwin list CCed] On Nov 16 23:38, Angelo Graziosi wrote: > ...in 'setup.ini', "0.9.8p-1" is under '[prev]', so we cannot > upgrade to it :( That's weird. I "fixed" that now by adding "curr" and "prev" entries to the setup.hint files, but actually that shouldn't be necessary and never was. Has something changed in upset lately, so that 0.9.8p-1 is not recognized as being newer than 0.9.8o-2 anymore? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple