X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Yahoo-SMTP: Uu383n6swBCEN1G9up0WSnxbvN8fCPmk Message-ID: <4CDC3CB5.4080300@cygwin.com> Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 13:57:57 -0500 From: "Larry Hall \(Cygwin\)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Installing new versions of vim doesn't uninstall old versions References: <0C33B811BB93B3469F549ADBFA84414718BC77B4B2 AT NALASEXMB08 DOT na DOT qualcomm DOT com> <4CDC342B DOT 7010308 AT cygwin DOT com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 11/11/2010 1:45 PM, René Berber wrote: > On 11/11/2010 12:21 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > >> On 11/11/2010 1:07 PM, Harrington, John wrote: >>> I recently had a problem with vim that was the result of my unwittingly >>> having two previous versions of vim in my /usr/bin. Is it normal for the >>> cygwin installer not to delete or clobber the previous versions? I'm not >>> sure what I did wrong, if anything, in updating my cygwin installation. >> >> Probably just a local glitch. We haven't seen other reports of this, >> though >> that could just mean that no one else has noticed. > > Actually there are many reports, its not just vim, similar reports have > been made about ssh, and checking for un-installed updates showed other > cases. > > setup.exe just leaves.exe.new (or .dll.new) and the change > never happens. > > It may have been one of the old versions of setup, I don't know, some > upgrades do happen correctly when an old one is still there, and left there. Yeah, maybe that explains this one too. If John was using 'vim.exe' when he did an update, then this could be the result. But there is no vim-specific issue here. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple