X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4CD07E53.5050602@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:10:43 -0700
From: Daniel Colascione <dan DOT colascione AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [patch 7/8] Backport shellword movement functions from bash 4.1
References: <20101102204855 DOT 153395100 AT gmail DOT com> <20101102205036 DOT 943395100 AT gmail DOT com> <4CD07B02 DOT 8070301 AT redhat DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <4CD07B02.8070301@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 11/2/2010 1:56 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 11/02/2010 02:49 PM, dan DOT colascione AT gmail DOT com wrote:
>>  
>> +  rl_add_defun ("shell-forward-word", bash_forward_shellword, -1);
>> +  rl_add_defun ("shell-backward-word", bash_backward_shellword, -1);
>> +  rl_add_defun ("shell-kill-word", bash_kill_shellword, -1);
>> +  rl_add_defun ("shell-backward-kill-word", bash_backward_kill_shellword, -1);
> 
> Hmm, here, it probably makes more sense for me to bite the bullet and
> port my cygwin-specific stuff from bash 3.2 into bash 4.1, rather than
> trying to backport bash 4.1 stuff into my cygwin 3.2 build.
> 

Getting 4.1 would be better, sure, but it's not available right now, and
my patch series is. The backport is minimal and non-invasive. The
backport is also a separate patch, so you can just ignore it when
applying the rest of the changes to 4.1.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple