X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4CCD72FF.1000901@aol.com> Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 06:45:35 -0700 From: Tim Prince User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin c compiler and c99 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:346665536:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d29054ccd730032ca X-AOL-IP: 99.13.231.72 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 10/31/2010 6:21 AM, David wrote: > > Does Cygwin c compiler not support c99? > or does c99 not support?: > > #include > #include > > int main(void) { > bool f=true; > for(int i=0; i<10; i++) { > if (f) > printf("%d\n",i); > } > puts("Hello World!!!"); /* prints Hello World!!! */ > return EXIT_SUCCESS; > } > > Here the bool declaration fails and so do the for statement. The > compiler doesn't like that I use the iteration variable inside the > for-loop. > Neither I nor the compiler see a declaration of bool there. Is this example what you intended? After defining bool and true in terms of _Bool gcc -O -Wall -pedantic -std=c99 djb.c $ ./a 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Hello World!!! -- Tim Prince -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple