X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0	tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:12:50 +0200
From: Spiro Trikaliotis <an-cygwin AT spiro DOT trikaliotis DOT net>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <20101026171250.GB8299@trikaliotis.net>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <AANLkTimNQjY=wKa-vaKHbYZ0=A=g7xmQA1qZrAC7Fpke AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <AANLkTimoM_T4d-2DrDW4HWXEBJZFUKN1gv1FWvXcQ6yV AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <AANLkTikWnyxE12Z8rG7Ac+LTifQV=fwiSQOqxVgmSNp=@mail.gmail.com> <4CC6C5CB DOT 3090304 AT bopp DOT net> <AANLkTikMCAPCjjdXTymZaVrFbY50ZJcma0rE-ZngiA2P AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4CC6E743 DOT 6040601 AT bopp DOT net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4CC6E743.6040601@bopp.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 79.213.215.150
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: an-cygwin AT spiro DOT trikaliotis DOT net
Subject: Re: Subversion mangling names in .svn/entries metadata file
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on trikaliotis.net); Unknown failure
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hello,

* On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 09:35:47AM -0500 Jeremy Bopp wrote:
> On 10/26/2010 8:11 AM, J.C. Wren wrote:
 
> > Maybe I didn't explicitly say that I did reboot the system, but that's
> > not a reason to merely assume that I didn't.
> 
> On the contrary, I think it's a great reason to assume you didn't reboot
> given your description of how cygwin1.dll eventually got updated and the
> following quote:

My experience on user support (both from the side of giving support, as
well as from the side of receiving it) on other forums tells me that it
is never wrong to state the (expectedly) obvious. It happens every now
and then, even to the experienced users, that they forget something like
that. 

Thus, it is better to ask the obvious instead of trying to debug the
problem for hours, only to find out that the obvious was the problem in
the first place.

Best regards,
Spiro.

-- 
Spiro R. Trikaliotis                              http://opencbm.sf.net/
http://www.trikaliotis.net/                     http://www.viceteam.org/

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple