X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Gary Subject: Re: bash script + heredoc + tftp = bash ends unexpectedly Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:01:46 +0200 Lines: 35 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (cygwin) X-No-Archive: Yes Mail-Copies-To: never X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Csaba Raduly wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Gary wrote: >> Gary wrote: >>> The result of which is that I briefly see "hmmmm..." before the > script, >>> terminal (mintty), and bash processes all simply vanish. Now, even if > my >>> script is wrong, that seems... just mean. >> >> Hmm. Only happens if I start the script from the current directory, > like so: >>  . foo > > Note that the dot above does not mean the current directory. It is the > same as > > source foo Yeah, I know. I had forgotten, but investigating reminded me :) > I think the difference between the two cases is that ". foo" executes > the commands in foo in the current bash instance (as if you typed them > at the prompt) ... > Are you sure you don't have "exit" in your script somewhere? Oops. :"> Just ignore me. Nothing to see here. Move along now, move along. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple