X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4CC658F3.8030503@acm.org> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:28:35 -0700 From: David Rothenberger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101013 Thunderbird/3.1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Bash problems, strace, performance, etc. References: <4CBE119C DOT 9070504 AT veritech DOT com> <4CBE179C DOT 7020008 AT veritech DOT com> <4CBFCE23 DOT 3010706 AT laposte DOT net> <4CC0AF02 DOT 1090600 AT veritech DOT com> <4CC204F7 DOT 1030603 AT cornell DOT edu> <4CC20663 DOT 6080805 AT redhat DOT com> In-Reply-To: <4CC20663.6080805@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 10/22/2010 2:47 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 10/22/2010 03:41 PM, Ken Brown wrote: >> On 10/22/2010 12:32 AM, Andy Koppe wrote: >>> On 21 October 2010 22:22, Lee D. Rothstein wrote: >>>>> do you have bash-completion, if yes, get rid of it and try again. >>>> >>>> Bash completion is installed on my system but never loaded; i.e., >>>> /etc/bash_completion is not sourced in '~/.bashrc', or >>>> '~/.profile', or anywhere else. >>> >>> It gets loaded by /etc/profile.d/bash_completion.sh, which is sourced >>> by /etc/profile. >> >> I wonder if this was a packaging bug in bash-completion. Eric's >> announcement >> (http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin-announce/2010-06/msg00061.html) said >> the following: >> >> You MUST edit your bash startup files to load bash-completion into >> memory: > > Hmm - maybe this is a case of a copy and paste bug on my part. > Certainly, before bash-completion 1.0, you had to manually enable > things. But it looks like 1.0 and later (first cygwin build in Apr > 2009) inherit the upstream default of automatic enabling. > > I'll have to revisit that next time I package bash-completion, and > either fix the release notes to match reality, or alter the packaging to > restore the manual enabling (but note that other distros like Fedora do > automatic enabling if you install the package, so that's the direction > I'm leaning in). If you do decide to leave in the automatic enabling, it might be worth mentioning in the release email that users from the pre-1.0 era should remove the manual loading. My bash startup times doubled when I upgraded to 1.0 because I was enabling twice and it took me a little while to figure out why. -- David Rothenberger ---- daveroth AT acm DOT org Famous quotations: " " -- Charlie Chaplin " " -- Harpo Marx " " -- Marcel Marceau -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple