X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,TW_LG,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <252576.94771.qm@web25508.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:22:02 +0100 (BST)
From: Marco Atzeri <marco_atzeri AT yahoo DOT it>
Subject: Re: -static not working with gcc 4.3.4
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <20101018125833.GB25504@const>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

--- Lun 18/10/10, Samuel Thibault  scritto:

> > > From: Samuel Thibault
> > > $ cat test.c
> > > int main(void) {}
> > > $ gcc test.c -o test -static
> > >
> /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.3.4/../../../../i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ld:
> > > cannot find -lgcc_s
> > >
> /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.3.4/../../../../i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ld:
> > > cannot find -lgcc_s
> > >=20
> > > There indeed is libgcc_s.dll.a in
> /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/, but for
> > > some reason gcc doesn't seem to be happy with it.
> This is using gcc4
> > > and
> > > gcc4-core 4.3.4-3.=A0 gcc-3 works fine.
> >=20
> > Please, why such a large test case when the following
> would
> > have been perfectly adequate to demonstrate the
> problem?:
> >=20
> > $ cat test.c
> > main() {}
> > $
>=20
> Because providing precise information is always better when
> reporting a
> bug, whatever the circumstances.
>=20
> That being said, I'd still like to see this bug fixed: the
> -static is
> suppoed to be able to work alone.
>=20
> Samuel
>=20

have you checked if 4.5 has the same problem ?

http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2010-08/msg00016.html






--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple