X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Oleksandr Gavenko Subject: Re: Sending signals to a subprocess Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:46:18 +0300 Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <4CB9DE15 DOT 8010308 AT cornell DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 In-Reply-To: <4CB9DE15.8010308@cornell.edu> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 16.10.2010 20:17, Ken Brown wrote: > I could use some help fixing a longstanding bug in the Cygwin build of > emacs, in which emacs is unable to send signals to subprocesses. This off top but I use native Emacs and have annoying bug: in C-x shell if I start cygwin app it can not be broken by C-c C-c (try run 'yes' utility). But while :; do echo +; sleep 1; done can be broken by C-c C-c. Also 'yes' can be broken by C-c C-\ (QUIT). -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple