X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,TW_YG,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Subject: Re: ocaml: patches needed From: Damien Doligez In-Reply-To: <1439640916.139526.1286812910597.JavaMail.root@zmbs1.inria.fr> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:47:02 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3F718711-595B-44C5-B2A8-61CF29BA00A4@inria.fr> References: <1439640916 DOT 139526 DOT 1286812910597 DOT JavaMail DOT root AT zmbs1 DOT inria DOT fr> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Yaakov, > Thanks for updating OCaml to use FlexDLL. There are some further > patches required for a fully-functional OCaml: I agree with your suggestions, and I'll use your patches and cygport file, except for the way you implement this: > 2) package camlp4 separately due to its size; I think it's a bad idea to have something named "ocaml" that doesn't implement the full upstream package. What I will do instead is: ocaml-base for the system except camlp4 ocaml-camlp4 for camlp4 ocaml an empty helper package that depends on ocaml-base and ocaml-c= amlp4 I'm not sure what to name the base package: it could be ocaml-base or ocaml-core. Is there a generally-accepted naming convention for such cases? -- Damien -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple