X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:41:11 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: trouble posting to cygwin-apps Message-ID: <20101008154111.GB23848@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <1286518842 DOT 1832 DOT 42 DOT camel AT OG3> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1286518842.1832.42.camel@OG3> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08:20:42AM +0200, SZAB? Gergely wrote: >The mailing list does not accept html email, that's fair enough. > >The real problem is, it also bounces every email with a company >disclaimer about intentions and original addressees. >Well, the original addressee is cygwin at cygwin dot com, which is a public >mailing list, readable even from Alpha Centauri (with 4 years delay). > >This policy is OK for most FOSS projects, but Cygwin should be an >exception. I think Cygwin is used most by 3PPs within big companies >where everybody _must_ use Windows and those disclaimers are always attached to >outgoing mail. If you are a free and sane person, attracted to unixy stuff, >you'd probably use Linux. > >Yes, I've read the posting instructions, and I know I should convince my >employer to remove the disclaimers. What chance do you think I have to >convince a 20000-employee company, where central IT is not even in my >country? They also restrict access to private email from the office. > >I know, I should leave them and/or buy a smartphone for emailing. :-) > >But my point is: the mailing list is cut off from its most important >audience. As I think you understand, the cygwin-apps list, like every other list at sourceware.org/gcc.gnu.org does not allow company disclaimers. That is not going to change. We block the disclaimers because they are intended to be legally binding directives and as such we do not want to be encumbered. This is a site-wide policy. It is not malleable due to the need of the people who want to send email. Since the cygwin mailing list is always in the top two for site traffic I think it's safe to say that we aren't suffering too much from this restriction but, even if it was, I don't really ascribe to the notion that we're suffering from lack of contributors to the project because we block disclaimers. As Eric Blake points out, there are plenty of ways to get a message posted here without going through the corporate firewall. But, even if none of those are acceptable, it isn't really up to the administrators at this site to accommodate your needs. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple