X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-50.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Subject: gcc: stable 4.5 soon?
From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 13:20:34 -0500
Message-ID: <1286475634.5420.59.camel@YAAKOV04>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Dave,

I have been using a gcc-4.5.1 built with your 4.5.0 patchset for some
time.  Besides the issues I noted back in August[1], I have been pleased
with its performance.  Any chance we can get a stable 4.5.1 soon with at
least the easier issues noted therein fixed?


Yaakov

[1] http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-08/msg00412.html



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple