X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4CADC30B.9060505@kitware.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 08:54:35 -0400
From: Bill Hoffman <bill DOT hoffman AT kitware DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: trouble posting to cygwin-apps
References: <4CAA3A16 DOT 1000103 AT kitware DOT com>	 <4CAB8EA9 DOT 8020104 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm>  <4CAB98BF DOT 8050006 AT kitware DOT com>	 <1286315505 DOT 8828 DOT 334 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04>  <4CABA2F9 DOT 6090906 AT kitware DOT com> <1286432454 DOT 5420 DOT 49 DOT camel AT YAAKOV04>
In-Reply-To: <1286432454.5420.49.camel@YAAKOV04>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 10/7/2010 2:20 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 18:13 -0400, Bill Hoffman wrote:
>> Really this belongs on the CMake dev list.
>
> In so much as this affects a Cygwin packages, it is perfectly on topic
> here.
>
>> The new release I just posted is not really a new release of CMake, but
>> it is a new release for cygwin.  The current cmake that comes with
>> cygwin is 2.6.4 (very old).  The one I just uploaded was 2.8.2 (still
>> old but much newer.)  It has no changes at all.
>
> How exactly is 2.8.2 old when it is the latest official release?
>
>> We are currently working on 2.8.3, it has some of the patches you want,
>> but not all.  However, please work with me on the cmake dev list to come
>> up with a solution that won't break all of the projects I support (VTK,
>> ITK, and several others).
>
> That may be the long term solution, but right now we need a working
> cmake, and your 2.8.2-1 isn't it.  You want WIN32 defined on Cygwin, but
> *we* do not.  As so far as the Cygwin distribution is concerned,
> shouldn't the views of those who make the distribution take priority?
>
>> I do not want to create a cygwin release that does not match the
>> upstream CMake.
>
> Unfortunately we need you to do exactly that until upstream has been
> fixed.
>

So, I thought that I was the cmake maintainer for cygwin?  So, really I 
don't "need" to do anything.  I really don't want two version out there. 
  If someone builds CMake from source and it behaves totally different 
than the one that comes with cygwin, that IMO is a very bad thing, and 
will cause lots of confusion.  And seriously we are working on exactly 
what you want, and CMake has been like this for 10 years now, I would 
think you could be a bit more patient and give me some more time to come 
up with the correct fix.

-Bill

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple