X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Subject: Re: Slowdown after update on Win32 (XP Home) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?SZAB=D3?= Gergely To: Michael Ludwig Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <20101006185911.GG3984@wladimir> References: <20100930231948 DOT GA792 AT wladimir> <4CA52D89 DOT 4010208 AT cygwin DOT com> <20101002000810 DOT GA6024 AT wladimir> <4CA924BF DOT 3020806 AT cygwin DOT com> <20101006185911 DOT GG3984 AT wladimir> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 23:30:50 +0200 Message-ID: <1286400650.1825.4.camel@OG3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hello, please see this thread (test scripts included): http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-09/msg00871.html I can only confirm this. Process creation is much slower with 1.7.7 than it was with 1.5.25. The "fork" script runs 300% slower on my XP box. But on the other hand, Marco Atzeri could not confirm this on his XP box. I'm sure it's all about time slowing down in the vicinity of black holes... Best regards Gergely -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple