X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: Stephen Leake To: Subject: Re: Emacs Gnus elisp source? References: <4CAA18E1 DOT 4070507 AT cornell DOT edu> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:17:18 -0100 In-Reply-To: <4CAA18E1.4070507@cornell.edu> (Ken Brown's message of "Mon, 4 Oct 2010 13:11:45 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (cygwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.0.10011,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-10-04_07:2010-10-04,2010-10-04,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Ken Brown writes: > On 10/4/2010 1:07 PM, Stephen Leake wrote: >> I'm using the Cygwin X version of Emacs Gnus for email. I recently >> switched from some other version of TLS to the Cygwin gnutls. >> >> When I switched, it started prompting me for the send password with each >> email I send. Previously, it would cache the password somewhere. >> >> I'd like to debug this, but the elisp source files are missing, and I >> don't see how to get the Cygwin installer to install them. > > The elisp source files are in the emacs-el package. Ah. I did look, but apparently I just didn't see that. Sorry for the noise. Now I can see the sources; thanks. >> I also don't see the precise version on the FSF Gnu FTP site; Emacs >> reports 23.2.1, but I only see 23.2 there. > > This is a common source of confusion. The short answer is that you > should ignore the final '.1'. For a longer answer, see > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-08/msg00891.html Ok, thanks; I've never noticed that before. >> Hints on getting gnutls to work better with Emacs Gnus are also welcome. > > There's been a lot of discussion about this lately on the emacs-devel > mailing list, which I haven't been following in detail. Me either; too much traffic. > I think you can expect a lot of improvement in gnutls integration in > emacs-24, but probably not before that. Ok, thanks -- -- Stephe -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple