X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 18:00:33 +0400 From: Andrey Repin Reply-To: Andrey Repin Message-ID: <224999170.20101001180033@mtu-net.ru> To: Csaba Raduly , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: diff issue In-Reply-To: References: <1842787202 DOT 20100930054004 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <20100930151033 DOT M76347 AT ds DOT net> <191883817 DOT 20101001042301 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <20101001015713 DOT M64956 AT ds DOT net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Greetings, Csaba Raduly! > Andrey Repin wrote: >>>>> When I'm comparing them with my usual macro >>>>> diff -bdu -x "CVS" -x ".svn" -I "\$Id.*\$" -I "\$Revision.*\$" -I >>>>> "\$Date.*\$" -I "\$Author.*\$" --strip-trailing-cr -- '1/backup.bat' >>>>> 'backup.bat' >>>>> It telling me that $Id$ lines are differ. >>>>> But when I remove the "@echo off" from second file, it telling me >>>>> that files are "identical" (the expected result). > Did you get something similar to the following ? Practically, I get exactly this result. > --- 1/backup.bat 2010-10-01 09:55:59.070190500 +0200 > +++ backup.bat 2010-10-01 09:56:19.112194500 +0200 > @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ > -rem $Id: backup.bat,v 1.1 2007/07/17 01:53:30 Daemon Exp $ > +@echo off > +rem $Id: backup.bat 10 2010-09-30 01:22:14Z anrdaemon $ > rar a -ag-YYYY-MM-DD_HH-MM -- MinerTimer @MinerTimer.list > I suspect that the -I switch told diff "do not start a difference if > the line matches" rather than "consider this line to always match". > This behavio(u)r is counter-intuitive, but is probably required; > otherwise the generated diff would be unusable for patch(1). I was thinking the same way. -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT freemail DOT ru) 01.10.2010, <17:59> Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple