X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,TW_SV,TW_YG,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4CA34E46.1090000@cs.umass.edu> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:33:42 -0400 From: Eliot Moss Reply-To: moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Inconsistency in handling a DOS path between subversion commands References: <4CA34C01 DOT 6080908 AT gmail DOT com> In-Reply-To: <4CA34C01.6080908@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com You're lucky if any DOS-like paths work for any svn commands. It's really a Unix-based tool and will not generally grok the C: and \ stuff. The occasional command *might* work, but it will be hit or miss. Better to use cygpath to convert and DOS-like names to Unix-like ones before feeding to svn ... Regards -- Eliot Moss -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple