X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 21:39:52 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: distro "apache2" will not start Message-ID: <20100917193952.GB18327@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4C92B2EF DOT 9060002 AT columbus DOT rr DOT com> <20100917073705 DOT GH15121 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4C937E7F DOT 40009 AT acm DOT org> <20100917150210 DOT GB14602 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4C9384D0 DOT 2060601 AT acm DOT org> <4C93B9B9 DOT 9000509 AT acm DOT org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C93B9B9.9000509@acm.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Sep 17 11:55, David Rothenberger wrote: > apache2-devel is not needed by subversion if I don't build the apache2 > module. I do need to install a native apache2 instance with subversion > support in order to test the http support in the client, but I suppose I > can do that. So it only makes sense to provide the subversion-apache package if we also provide apache2, right? > Okay by me to remove apache2 from the distro. I'll try to spin a new > subversion release soon without subversion-apache2. I need to get the > native apache2/svn server running first. Sounds good to me. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple