X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 19:49:51 +0200
From: David Sastre <d DOT sastre DOT medina AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: simplifying rebaseall
Message-ID: <20100917174951.GD3503@jethro.local.lan>
References: <AANLkTimP2TqucKt075ZyfTOMzEByUEUboBTz5V-SVEwX AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <AANLkTi=uFBTQkY6BP03PO2+wsBeOVDitF0CNyLBDj-3C AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4C938040 DOT 3080704 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4C9389EA DOT 7050704 AT cygwin DOT com> <AANLkTi=mGAdGLR_cMRZuXYQB-T9qxVcDNm7hQxpbcDwN AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4C939F7A DOT 1020902 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <AANLkTinwOhJjYZw0L-5qw8rhgzHxPF6qG2_HCQTzayY6 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VMt1DrMGOVs3KQwf"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinwOhJjYZw0L-5qw8rhgzHxPF6qG2_HCQTzayY6@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

--VMt1DrMGOVs3KQwf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 07:38:03PM +0200, Al wrote:
> Hi,

Hello,

> It's familiar that regular programs have a doc, man etc. It's also
> familiar that small maintenance scripts don't have. Even your posting
> has more lines the he rebaseall script itself. So you wouldn't really
> follow the search path for docs you give here. That there is a readme
> for such a small script is the positive execption. But I have doubts
> that many people will find it.

I guess for many people cygwin is their first contact with a *NIX like
environment, but given your previous knowledge in Linux, it could also
have been and option to inspect the package contents:

cygcheck -l rebase

Regards.

--=20
Huella de clave primaria: 0FDA C36F F110 54F4 D42B  D0EB 617D 396C 448B 31EB

--VMt1DrMGOVs3KQwf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkyTqj8ACgkQYX05bESLMethlgCePm/NmHR5Srs9mN1B9qzlbAmA
WB4An1XEK8tRlhwaEGlklUw83Ts+zzwj
=1SBQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--VMt1DrMGOVs3KQwf--