X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4C939F7A.1020902@cwilson.fastmail.fm> References: <4C938040 DOT 3080704 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4C9389EA DOT 7050704 AT cygwin DOT com> <4C939F7A DOT 1020902 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 19:38:03 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: simplifying rebaseall From: Al To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hi, I appreciate you take the time to contribute all that information. Hope it is not only red by me. > > Now, surely that is a lot of hunting around -- but I can only assume > that many people did so, since you are apparently the first person to > fail to locate the documentation when faced with the question "How do I > run rebaseall"? I wasn't faced with that question. I was face with error messages. Google guided me by this messages (and many others) to exactly this blog first: http://www.mylifestartingup.com/2009/04/fatal-error-unable-to-remap-to-same= .html ... not to Cygwin list, not to the readme, not to the FAQ. The blog rather tells how to run rebaseall not much why. The comments document well that many people follow that advice without any knowledge of any readme. You don't even find the word readme on that blog. > See above. =A0Most of that should be very familiar to a person with "10 > years of Linux experience" -- except for the bit about "Cygwin packages > often put a cygwin-specific README file in /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/" > It's familiar that regular programs have a doc, man etc. It's also familiar that small maintenance scripts don't have. Even your posting has more lines the he rebaseall script itself. So you wouldn't really follow the search path for docs you give here. That there is a readme for such a small script is the positive execption. But I have doubts that many people will find it. Al -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple