X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4C8F249D.9050603@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:30:37 +0800 From: JonY User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080213 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New package: mingw64-x86_64-gcc-4.5.1-1 References: <4C8F1CF2 DOT 8000703 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <4C8F2451 DOT 9020906 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> In-Reply-To: <4C8F2451.9020906@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 9/14/2010 15:29, Charles Wilson wrote: > On 9/14/2010 2:57 AM, JonY wrote: >> That is weird. >> >> Do you have mingw64 binutils installed? Somehow the cygwin binutils was >> used. > > I don't know about Andy, but I sure do -- and I can reproduce his > problem. I suspect there is a "bug" in how the cross tool locates the > /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bin > directory, given the mount structure: > /usr/bin = /bin > /usr/lib = /lib > BUT > /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32 != /x86_64-w64-mingw32 > > because if I do THIS: > mount -o bind /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32 /x86_64-w64-mingw32 > > then > /bin/x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -o foo foo.c > works, just as if I had invoked > x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -o foo foo.c > > I say this is a "bug" in quotes, because...well, I'm not sure it fits > the definition. It's *our* fault we use a wacky mount structure on cygwin... > > -- > Chuck > So, if /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32 actually exists, it works? This looks bad, nonetheless. Maybe we can fix cygwin by only redirecting known directories like, /usr/bin and /usr/lib to those in /. It would probably break third party apps, so its not entirely good either. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple