X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 12:41:12 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Oddities with file deletion on CIFS drive
Message-ID: <20100911104111.GN16534@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <1830BEA90D9D88BCE0394504@[192.168.1.2]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1830BEA90D9D88BCE0394504@[192.168.1.2]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Sep 10 10:48, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Friday, September 10, 2010 7:09 PM +0200 Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> 
> >>Let me know if there is anything else I can provide.
> >
> >I'm not sure.  I don't think so.  The problem is that the unlink(2)
> >function in Cygwin does not get any error code from any of the OS
> >functions it calls.  So, from the Cygwin POV everything worked fine.
> >How is it supposed to know that anything has gone wrong, if the
> >underlying OS doesn't tell?
> 
> Heh, magic I guess.  If I mount the drive as a CIFS drive from a Linux box,
> I can delete the files just fine, so for now that gives me a workaround
> (I'll move my deletion process to a Linux box).

This morning I had an idea.  While we were looking into the ACL, we
neglected the DOS attributes.  When you call `attrib' on one of the
files for which you didn't call chmod yet, is the R/O attribute set?

If so, it *could* explain why Cygwin thought it has successfully deleted
the file, but it hasn't.  I also might have a workaround for this.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple