X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:12:25 -0700 From: Quanah Gibson-Mount To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Oddities with file deletion on CIFS drive Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4C883E89.40508@cygwin.com> References: <4C881018 DOT 4060809 AT cygwin DOT com> <4C881357 DOT 4070100 AT cygwin DOT com> <4C883E89 DOT 40508 AT cygwin DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com --On Wednesday, September 08, 2010 9:55 PM -0400 "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <> wrote: >> build AT zre-win-002 ~ >> $ id build >> uid=503(build) gid=513(None) groups=513(None) >> >> build AT zre-win-002 ~ >> $ grep build /etc/passwd >> build:unused:503:513:U-ZRE-WIN-002\build,S-1-5-21-1229272821-2049760794- >> 1417001333-1003:/home/build:/bin/bash > > This shouldn't be significant but is there a reason that you changed > your uid to 503 from 1003? 503 is what we usually use for the build user on our linux boxes, I had changed it to see if it would do anything ownership wise, but it didn't. I changed it back to 1003 and rebooted, but no change in behavior. >> build AT zre-win-002 ~ >> $ grep 513 /etc/group >> None:S-1-5-21-1229272821-2049760794-1417001333-513:513: > > Hm, what does 'ls -ln' look like? I can guess but I shouldn't do that. > ;-) -r-xr-xr-x 1 4294967295 4294967295 1453 2010-09-08 13:31 BUILD_ISYNC_template (etc) > That covers all the obvious things for me. I'd recommend taking a look at > the SAMBA server to see if user IDs are mapped correctly. Also, I know > there were some problems in the past with older Samba servers, bugs and > all. Make sure you're using a current version there. It may be > worthwhile to look at the permissions and owners from the Windows > perspective too. If that doesn't get you anywhere, I'd recommend filing > a full problem report on your follow-up to the list. See the link below > for full details: I don't think the CIFS server is using Samba, actually. It is a Celerra storage array from EMC (), and in this case, it isn't hooked up to an AD server like they usually have them. >> Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Ok, thanks. --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple