X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_05,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SARE_RECV_IP_080178
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4C7CEFBF.6050409@graphtech.co.il>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:04:15 +0300
From: Sagi Ben-Akiva <sagi AT graphtech DOT co DOT il>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100714 SUSE/2.0.6-3.1 SeaMonkey/2.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Cygwin slow on x64 systems
References: <4C7B9327 DOT 9030204 AT graphtech DOT co DOT il> <4C7BDEC0 DOT 306 AT sidefx DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <4C7BDEC0.306@sidefx.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Edward Lam wrote:

> Just curious, has the performance characteristics of your test changed
> with the lastest cygwin snapshot? The affected code has moved somewhat
> since revision 1.288.


I ran my test script on version 1.7.6 and
on the release from today, i.e. 1.7.7-1,
and performance are even worse.
I get only 5 lines/second.

Sagi.


-- 
Sagi Ben-Akiva - sagi at graphtech dot co dot il
GraphTech Computer Systems,
www.graphtech.co.il

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple