X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Yahoo-SMTP: mjD.OBqswBAPbVUxYJaYPvc61jLEnpq8VnBwJGdbEJOPA9xw Message-ID: <4C78317A.2080008@sbcglobal.net> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 21:43:22 +0000 From: Greg Chicares User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: BLODA diagnostics References: <20100827165751 DOT GZ10153 AT gremlin DOT foo DOT is> <20100827212217 DOT GA10153 AT gremlin DOT foo DOT is> In-Reply-To: <20100827212217.GA10153@gremlin.foo.is> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 2010-08-27 21:22Z, Baldur Gislason wrote: > I am attempting to diagnose why fork() fails during the cygwin installation. > It looks like some kind of BLODA may be causing this, per documentation, but > obviously, the list of known troublemakers in the documentation does not > cover all troublemakers and I'd like to trace what is going on. Does it succeed in "safe mode with networking"? If so, then by a process of elimination you may be able to find what's causing the problem. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple