X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4C77D42E.1000005@coastside.net> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:05:18 -0700 From: Blaine Miller User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: How/Where do I get an older version of Cygwin? References: <4C76BA95 DOT 3070201 AT coastside DOT net> <4C76BF63 DOT 9000109 AT cygwin DOT com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: ecf88e7cc6fd12df69adbcfd4248abb35e89bb4777695beb00ff6c36d42eb1faa9e4b3c7fc2b1b8a2ba9cf68db78be75350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Andy, Thanks very much for your thoughtful consideration. I do indeed see a *Prev* button... I understand about the risks of reverting back to a previous version, however, I may have no choice for political rather than technical reasons. Thanks again! Blaine Andy Koppe wrote: > On 26 August 2010 20:24, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > >> On 8/26/2010 3:03 PM, Blaine Miller wrote: >> >>> PS... I read in the archives the following quote... >>> >>> Rerun 'setup.exe' and pick "Prev". >>> >>> There is no such option that I can find... >>> >> Look at the page where you select packages, just above the list of >> packages and to the right, next to the "Category" button. "Cur" is >> the default selected radio button. "Prev" is one of the other >> options. >> > > I'd recommend against using the "Prev" button. It gives you a rather > random collection of old packages, where some are years older than the > current one and others just a couple of weeks. There's no guarantee > that those disparate versions will actually work together properly, in > fact, it's very likely that things will break. It sure doesn't get > tested. > > Going back to the previous version of a particular package is useful > when there's a regression in the latest version, but doing the same > across the whole distro, not so much. Cygwin 1.5 and setup-legacy.exe > is the way to go if you want something old and unsupported that > actually works. > > Question: would anyone miss the "Prev" button if it were to disappear? > > Andy > > -- > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > > > > > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple