X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4C739C7E.1080105@ece.cmu.edu> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:18:38 +0200 From: Ryan Johnson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Bopp CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Re: X-forwarding very very slow References: <4C6C5205 DOT 8080200 AT bopp DOT net> In-Reply-To: <4C6C5205.8080200@bopp.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 8:59 PM, Jeremy Bopp wrote: > On 8/18/2010 11:55 AM, Csaba Raduly wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Alberto Canestrelli wrote: >>> Hi, >>> I have a problem with Cygwin. I am connecting from USA by ssh to the Hector >>> supermachine in Edinburgh ( I write "startx" in Cygwin and then I use "ssh >>> -Y v1acanes AT login DOT hector DOT ac DOT uk" ). Everything works fine, the only problem >>> is that the forwarding of the windows is very very slow. >> Hi Alberto, >> It would be useful if you could try a non-Cygwin X server (e.g. a >> Linux or Solaris workstation). If X from under Linux appears fast, >> then the slowdown could be between your network card and display >> (probably Cygwin's fault). If X from Linux is also slow, the problem >> may be with the propagation of the X protocol between your network >> card and Hector (probably not Cygwin's fault) . > You could also try enabling compression with -C. I have found this to > be a necessity when connecting with X over ssh between work and home > even though the locations are quite near each other and plain text based > ssh access runs fine without the compression. In my experience, any "off-campus" access to X is best done via VNC or rdesktop (both over a compressed ssh tunnel). Triply so if you're crossing an ocean. The protocol simply was not designed with slow or laggy networks in mind, from what I can tell. There are faster X-servers for windows, but not free, and I haven't noticed that they reduce the amount of protocol chatter much, especially for the unbearably slow process of opening a new window. Regards, Ryan -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple